第十二章 吸毒第十三章 科學
第四十一章 盜 取私人 財､物
人類以「聲、像」為萬物取名。 人類將其分為實物與虛物。實物與虛物的 劃分則以其是否存於宇宙為定。例如，人、植物和銀河稱為「 實物」；心靈、天堂和鬼魂稱為「虛物」。然而﹐鬼魂與幽靈只存於三度空間則難以區分。
我認為光子是一件物質﹐雖然科學界的人士否認我的看法。科學界的人士以「光線」、「放射線」代稱「光子」。我認為光子在正弦軌道上每秒運行4.71e8公尺﹐一般人卻認為光子在正弦軌道上每秒運行 2.99 e8公尺。人類應該用更正確的字詞來形容宇宙。我認為一顆微粒是一個物質，光子很可能就是物質的根源。此外﹐光子也會佔據空間。我想光子已存於宇宙﹐我們並不知道它是何時產生的。就那原子核爆炸來說﹐我想光子就是物質﹐這樣的光子可見於一把火中。在這一把火中﹐光子從一個可燃性的物質轉移到肉眼看不出的物質﹐這種可燃性的物質使得光子縮小了。
神這個字第一次出現於"G", "O"和"D"這些字樣。"G", "O"和"D"這些字曾被用來表達神的死後回生。五千年前﹐古埃及人對神這個字有了不同的看法﹐他們認為神這個字就好像奧沙瑞爾(Osiris)和皮塔(Ptach)一樣的稱呼。之後﹐像瑪達、宙斯、丘比特、阿拉、彌穌亞和神這些字都只是一種稱呼罷了。
Observed truth is of more value than stories that are obviously false, or have never been seen to be true. No where in the universe is there matter, I would call "Zeus". There are protons, there are photons, there may be statues made of clay in the shape of a human with the word "Zeus", but there is no matter I would call Zeus, diablo, Poseidon, Marduk, Ptach, or any of the more old popular gods. What is interesting is that most humans will agree that there is no Santa. These humans will say, when asked, that there is no tooth fairy, no easter bunny, perhaps even no angels, but when you say soul, spirit, heaven, hell, or god (not gods) these humans will back out. This is what makes me more special. I move forward, when other humans can step forward no further.
Even Albert Einstein made the error of thinking that a god exists. Isaac Newton made this error, I made this error, and other humans will make this error. I learned and realize now that humans made the word god, and like all the ghosts, witches and millions of other words, there is no such thing in this universe. If Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton have made this error, what else can be wrong in the thinking of these two humans? This opens the possibility that, like all humans, Einstein and Newton made at least one error. Atheist humans do not make this error, and yet almost no atheist humans are as popular as Einstein and Newton were and are.
Religion is the most popular money for no product or service business of planet earth. When a human thinks, like most humans that there is a god, the human stops and will go no further on the path to truth. Other humans that realize that there is no god or devil continue forward. All religious humans have one thing in common, these humans think that a god exists. What images do humans think of, if any, when a human hears the word "god"? Because this word applies to no matter in the universe, most humans think of an image of a more old than average aged male human.
Not one of the humans in religion has graduated from a college of science. Because all of the humans in all religions have no education and no interest in education, these humans have no skills, or care for truth. The humans in the religions are the most stupid with the least education. How can these humans be seen as caring for truth more than other humans? Religious humans never learned from good and smart humans teaching science in the colleges. Most humans in religion have never learned math, how to type, how to program a computer, anatomy, or to use a musical instrument, but these humans speak to, and are listened to by millions of other humans.
Humans in religion sometimes try to "save appearances" for the missing god. Like the astronomy system described by Ptolomy before the star center system described by Aristarcos and Copernicus was more popular. For example, humans in radio and television buildings use brain image and sound machines to see and hear what humans and all species with brains think. Some of the humans in the television buildings will repeat what some of the humans watching are thinking. The humans watching have never seen a machine that records the images and sounds brains think of, and explain this as a message from god, as coincidence, or as a new machine that can see and hear thoughts. I am happy that television will fall to the internet and the free trade of data, or copying of photons and electrons.
Life of different planets make errors, bad decisions. Some times these decisions can result in the end of life on that planet, other times the error is not enough to end life on the planet. Rejecting truth and science while supporting religion, I think, has been an error that could result in the end of life on earth and in orbit, possibly life of this star system.
Words you will never hear in a church, synagogue, temple, and mosque include "photon", "galaxy", "atom", "ameba", "planet", "species", and "star" (instead of sun). The more religious a human, the less smart. The more religious, the less care for truth. The more religious, the more violent. Most religious humans do not want to go to other stars. Most religious humans say that the earth is "the world", not just another planet. In fact, the entire universe is called "the world" to most religious humans. Religious humans are not interested in growing life on other moons and planets, do not care to contain the humans that cause physical damage to other primates, and do not want to make a democracy for all life of earth.
Religion is one of the most serious problems on earth. The influence of religion is stopping sex, biological mating, touching, the capture, making and trade of images and sounds, the search for truth, science, free thinking, difference in appearance, difference in opinion, and pleasure.
Humans in religion try to scare other humans by saying that a human will go to hell after death. The human playing pope this year has told of the pain of being in hell. Dante describes what hell is like. Have these humans been to hell? How did these humans get to hell, by car? bike? rocket plane? How can these humans be sure with no photos? These humans must have special bodies, an extra arm, a third ear that lets the human get more data out of the universe than average humans. There is no hell, and humans have been saying there is a hell, and before the word "hell", a "hades", and before "hades", some other word or words, these humans are not even telling a new story. Humans pay money to hear this same scary story again and again. Hell was thought to be inside the earth. Humans have drilled thousands of meters in to the earth and not found any hell. The stories of religion change to fit the current explanation of the universe as described by humans in science. Do religious humans now think that the “heaven” first described by humans is inside the universe or outside of the universe? Hell is almost always described as being full of fire. I guess the photons in fire are not part of the story. The devil is at almost all times a red colored human with a black moustache and beard. Some times the image of this human will have a tail that looks like a monkey or horse tail. There is no need to make a pretend hell, because religious humans, by stopping pleasure and wasting every precious second telling 2000 year old obviously false stories are making a hell here on earth!
Religious humans pay no taxes in some parts of earth. All humans must be thought of as equal in law. There should be no exceptions, not even for humans that tell more accurate stories.
A good idea of how stupid religious humans are is that religious humans quote and take advice from humans that lived 2000 years before now! Most of the humans in religion are quoting text drawn 2000 or more years before now, a time when there were no planes, cars, electricity, microscopes, telescopes, computers, robots, not even novocaine! These humans are taking advice from humans that lived 2000 and more years before now, how accurate could the humans 2000 and more years before now be? For example, in the christian religion, humans say a female human was made from the rib of a male human. I want to ask how many humans think this story of a female human made from a male human rib is true, and then laugh for 1 or 2 hours.
All the religions on earth hold the idea that there is one or more god. With all the differences between religions, most religious humans are united with the idea that there is one god. The main religions on earth at this time are christianity, judaism, islam, buddhism, and hinduism.
Christianity is the idea that one human of the septillions of humans that have been killed on earth some how had a special connection to a god, was the son of a god. Amazing. How stupid can a human be? To worship one human like a king is never a good idea. No more monarchy, in particular when the human named king is dead! Jesus never contributed to science or cared for truth that is seen and measured. Other humans living at the same time cared more for truth. Why not learn information on and celebrate some body like Hypatia, a human that was killed by christian humans 1570 years before now. At least Hypatia was interested in the search for truth called science.
Judaism is more old than Christianity. Most judeo humans are jewish humans. Jesus was a jewish human and went against judaism, claiming not to actually be god, only being made from the sperm of god. So not the most self centered, only second most self centered. Judaism humans think there is one god and that Jesus was only a normal human made of DNA.
Islam was started after Christianity by another human that did not add to science and did not care for truth with the name Mohammed of Mecca. In Islam, "god" is called "allah", and “satan” is called "shatan".
Buddhism is seen most in China and was formed in India by a human named Buddha I guess. In Buddhism there is the idea of a god. Confucianism and Taoism are two other religions in China. What is good in China is the interest in science and atheism, not good is the lack of democracy.
Hinduism is a religion with more than one god. One of the gods is called "Shiva", I guess. I will have to search more for this.
I compare the humans that wear crosses and stars of David to be similar to the humans in Nazi Germany wearing swastika symbols. The same is true for flags, and other symbols. This kind of need to look like other humans, support the idea of a nation and religion is not good and is some thing to fear. Huygens said "the world is my country, science my religion".
Marriage is a bad idea in my opinion. Marriage is religious, and humans are following a bad tradition. All marriages in the past were given by religious humans, and only in the last hundreds of years have marriages been given by judge humans. Marriage is not natural. The natural design of the human body indicates an interest in variety, a need for touching more than one human. Like a type of food, a song, or a movie, seeing, tasting, or hearing the same thing makes a human (and any body of life on earth) lose interest in the same bread, and gain an interest in some thing different to taste, see, and hear. Natural mating happens with no marriage ceremony, no special costumes, no jewelry or rings. As a result of not natural mating, humans are made by two humans that need fear of a god, and a special tribal costume ceremony to mate. Mating is more good and natural than marriage.
What need is there for a wedding ring if two humans want to live in the same building and reproduce? When did jewelry enter into mating? Every where I look I see humans with the silver plain wedding ring, and on females, some kind of diamond ring. That all these humans wear the same ring, is like marching in some kind of an army. Does no body defy tradition? What is the fear of looking different from every body else?
Why the need for a marriage ceremony? There is no change in life on earth the second both of the humans say "I do". If the two humans really care for each other, there should be no need for the sounds that some other religious or judge human is vibrating in air.
How scripted and boring marriage is. I refuse to think for a second that there is 1 millionth the electricity and excitement in marriage than of touching and having sex of mutual consent with some body you have only seen 10 minutes before. Sexual wants, like other senses are driven by a need for variety, and staying with and only touching one human for 80 years will never provide needed variety.
What keeps married humans together? For the most part a system designed to promote marriage. The humans and laws of governments promote the not natural ceremony of marriage! Humans are not thought of as equal humans and humans that wed can pay different taxes. The whole marriage idea is a bad idea. With some ink put on paper, and three shakes of a stick, two humans are legally considered married, and then have to go to court, to hear more sounds to make the two humans divorced.
Humans go to prison is some parts of earth, for marrying more than one human. The whole thing is a group of sounds, there are no bruises and if there are bruises, now may be the time to take a stand against violence, you will have to put away all your "kill all humans that sell drugs and stop sex" flags, or at least keep the "burn all drugs and hide all vaginas" signs in the back. Go for real interest in other humans not fear of a god that does not exist.
Then there is the divorce where any thing can happen, humans may be ordered by a human in a court to give half of their property and money to another human that has never earned a dollar.
No body needs to wed to reproduce. I hate that there is no system of touching and sex with consent offered by humans in science. I want to reproduce at least one time with a female human of every different kind of body type, hispanic, chinese, arab, india, nubian, jewish, native american, caucasian, as many as possible. There should be clear names, or genomes for all main body types.
I think that a number of humans that have married show less logic on some basic values because of marriage. Like religion, marriage limits the values and opinions of a human. Like religion, most humans that married or think there is a god have stopped or exited from the path of truth and pleasure. Because the truth of reproduction and mating with no marriage is not accepted, this path, probably the most popular in five or six hundred years, has not been explored, described, or shown.
Marriage is the only system offered to reproduce. There is no system of mating offered by humans in science. Most humans are never taught how to mate, never taught how to have sex, how a human is born, learns each sound, puts together sounds to make words, when a human learns to walk, what a human needs to survive, when a human should learn to use a toilet, can dress the self, can earn enough money to be independent.
I think putting a human in a box made out of wood and then putting the human in a box in the ground is not the best way of preserving a human body (or the body of any species). Then again, religious humans do not care for preserving bodies, change, or science and technology. I do not like most traditions, and traditional ceremonies. I like the tradition of science, and the search for truth humans can see. The idea of burial is for the most part religious and stupid.
Neanderthals were the first primates to bury dead bodies. Five thousand earth star rotations before now, humans in Egypt buried a human with different kinds of objects that these humans thought would be needed after death. The pyramids are where a pharaoh human was buried after death. Think of what could have been built for all humans living instead of one big pyramid and objects for a life after death that, of course, never happens.
The idea of a life after death is not new. To think that some part of a human goes to a heaven or hell is obviously less true and more false. Some humans think that the entire body goes to limbo, or heaven. No body ever thinks that the atoms of a dead body may still be here on earth and here in the universe. Most humans think the human body does not stay on earth is of no value once dead. I think that keeping the bodies of popular humans preserved and on display is a good idea. I think that there is no more matter ever made in the universe than the amount of matter that started with the universe. Some other humans think that matter can be made from empty space.
I like celebrating life while humans are alive. "Life is for the living" I say in one song. Billions of good humans have died, and every body will die in time unless humans in science can stop or slow aging. Perhaps there is life some where in the universe that lives for millions of milky way rotations. Humans may some time find a way to stop aging, or design DNA that can copy for the rest of time. When Chistopher Columbus died, one of the most big in size and money parades happened in Spain. Columbus died with less money than average humans. No body cared to celebrate, reward, touch, pleasure, or give money to Columbus when living.
Nude good. Nudity is good. Nudity causes no damage. The human body has beauty as does every object in the universe.
Because of religion and stupidity humans in the nude are some times labeled insane. Nude humans should not be locked in a jail. Nude humans should not be locked in a hospital. In fact no body should be locked in a hospital with no consent. All humans and all of life have beauty. I am one of the only humans to say that I think a nude human has beauty. Male humans have been taken to court for showing interest in the female body, as if male and female humans attracted to each other is bad! I think that teaching human anatomy and the anatomy of the other species will contribute to healing and new sciences that will add to the pleasure of life.
When the nude war is done, and nude humans are free to walk the planet earth and move in the space of the universe, are not locked in a jail or hospital, will the humans that locked humans in jails and hospitals be identified? Will these humans get less for locking humans in jails and hospitals? I think humans that lock humans that have never caused any damage in jails and hospitals will and are already viewed as humans that should get less than other humans.
Why do some humans think nude is bad? What harm does nude do? In my opinion, humans that show and share images of the naked self are advanced humans to be rewarded.
Think of the humans that call the humans in the police to arrest a human in the nude, and then the humans in the police capture the human. Is this Nazi Germany? What have these humans in the nude done? There is no pain or damage caused? These humans are not shooting any body. What is next, jail for wearing a hat?
Touch is good. Touch feels good when done with permission. For all the pleasure that touch gives, why no ads for touch? Why no events where humans touch? Why no body that will speak out for touching? For the most part religious humans think of touch as pleasure, and think pleasure is bad. Most of the humans that speak out against touch, or never speak out for touch are religious.
I get angry when hearing some body say "no public display of affection please!", or humans that try to stop touching in public, for example kissing. I see this in more young than average humans, the new nazi humans of this time. These humans hate to see a male human nude and support violence over nudity.
When a human is touching another body and there is no consent, and perhaps clear objection, the human and the other body should be separated. If there is any physical damage caused by the human, the human should be contained (decided by the constant votes of all humans) and kept alive (only if consent) for some popular decided time.
You must ask yourself when looking at all the humans in all the prisons and hospitals on planet earth:
"did the human (or body) cause any pain or physical damage to another body other than the self?" If no, then the body should not be contained in a room.
Some humans constantly use the word "love". For all the love where is the touching? So I say touch, love is an abstract word similar to hate. The most I can get out of love and hate is that both are sound and cause no bruise. If any thing, threats of violence are reason to watch and perhaps move to stop a human.
Touch at any age is good in my opinion. When there is no objection, no complaint, no bruising, no cuts, swelling, or pain there should be no bodies separated, or locked in a jail or hospital.
I am making an event I call "touch with consent". Where humans use a computer program to indicate a want to touch or be touched. For example "Ted get hug from any female human for 15 seconds", and "Ted give back rub to any human for 5 minutes". The pattern is: (BODY) (GIVE/GET) (TOUCH EVENT) (TO/FROM) (BODY2) (TIME DURATION). The time duration indicates that touching should stop any time before the time limit has ended. This "touch with consent" event will be the first event I have ever seen or heard of where humans can touch each other.
Violence is always wrong except perhaps in self defense from physical attack. Violence is the answer given by humans that never think of other answers. Instead of sending humans in planes to kill humans on some other part of earth (like in Cambodia, Viet Nam, Iraq, or Yugoslavia) put together a government for all of life on earth, and stop violence every where on planet earth by containing bodies that cause damage. Think of the humans sent to bomb Iraq. No images of violence are ever shown on television, magazines, books, or internet. How can any body be sure there is even 1 human in Iraq that has caused damage to a different human? Then, instead of identifying individual humans that caused damage, the humans from the United States explode bombs all over the Iraq surface of earth killing humans and other species that probably did cause damage with no consent, and some number of other humans and species that have not caused damage. Exploding some volume of space where a human that caused damage to a different human is, is not as good as identifying each human, and using robots and machines to capture as many humans that caused damage as possible. I see the machines that destroy, where are the machines that identify and capture?
I support walking cameras and making the images available for every body. Start at the borders of a country (say the United States or Mexico) and start to move the cameras in, as humans attack the cameras, make sure to identify each human and perhaps try to capture the humans causing damage to the cameras. Also use the cameras to identify humans that have caused damage to gain popular support for capturing a human that caused damage. Try to stop mammal on mammal violence on all parts of earth and everywhere life grows to. Do not stop images of violence.
After the killing of John Kennedy, Martin Luther King, John Lennon, Nicole Brown, all the humans in the prisons and killed in World War 2, still humans do not care to show, draw, speak out against, or stop violence. Stopping violence is one of the most low priorities after stopping drug use, stopping sex, stopping humans that drink alcohol and drive. There are 10 times more ads trying to stop drug use than trying to stop violence. No body is protesting for a stop to violence. An indication of the lack of interest in stopping violence can be seen in the never used combination of words "contain bodies that cause damage to other bodies with intent, no consent, and not in defense of a body". These words are proof of the missing thought that should be given to stopping pain, beatings, stabbings and shootings.
Humans are never locked in jail for fist fights. One example of this, is that the only "charge" available is called "assault". There is also "aggravated assault", that shows that some beating may be more bad than a “simple assault”. There are no "human punch human", "human bruise human" laws. Police humans only will make an arrest if there is a metal bullet gun being used. Humans that punch other humans in parks and schools are never locked in a jail. A human that shoots other humans that do not die is charged with "attempted homicide", never "damage to other human", does "attempted homicide" include thinking or drawing some body killed?
A good example of how stupid humans on earth are is the time that humans were asking "Who shot JR?", a human pretending to be shot in a popular television play/film/show. I am angered and not really surprised that humans care more for some body that was not killed than for the 34 humans killed each day in the United States alone. 34 humans killed every day in the United States makes me think that 340 humans are killed every day on planet earth. At the time of this typing, no humans have been locked in a prison for the killing of Nicole Brown, the shooting of Larry Flynt, the killing of Diane Fosse... the list of humans never contained on the earth that have damaged another human numbers in the millions or more.
Humans that say the human will use violence are average, and have a clear majority. This is obvious by the popularity of the words "kick ass". Speaking out for violence is more popular than speaking out against violence. While no body should be locked in jail or taken to court for demanding violence, I support humans that demand stopping of violence.
Think of the laws that have been made that I and you never voted on. Most laws do not describe the stopping of pain or physical damage. Some of these laws include slander, obscenity, stalking, printing money, drug use, sex for money, molestation, child pornography, sexual harassment, property theft, trespassing, locking in a hospital for 72 hours, forgery, speeding, reckless driving, nudity, sex in public, lewd, driving while intoxicated, and owning a gun. The list of laws of earth that are not to stop pain or damage number in the millions.
To destroy is more easy than to build. To cause damage is more simple than to stop the cause of damage. This is true for humans killing other humans, to kill some body like Hypatia or John Lennon is more easy than to stop a human from being killed. This is another reason that I use some amount of time to promote the stopping of violence, the containing of humans that have caused pain and damage to other humans, and the moving of matter before an event of damage might happen.
I think that humans should focus on stopping violence and damage with intent and no consent. There is more than one human that has a less than accurate description of the universe. Having bad opinions is no reason to be locked in a prison or hospital room. No body should be forced to stay in a hospital. If a human has been violent and caused physical damage to another human or some other life advanced past mammal (primate for example), the human should get a democratic trial or vote that includes all living humans at all times, to decide what happens to the human. No body should be in a court or jail that has not caused physical damage.
After all the bad that has been done from the use of the word "insane", I do not use the word "insane" to describe humans, I say "less than accurate interpretation of the universe". By this definition most religious humans would be labeled insane humans. No human has or ever will see spirits, gods, devils, ghosts, heaven and hell because none exist. In addition, humans can see when words like "god", and "heaven" were first made by other humans. No body should be locked in a prison for thinking false ideas are true, like thinking that the planet mars rotates the planet earth, because false ideas cause no damage. Humans and other objects cause damage. Deciding what humans are to be called "insane" or not has no value to me, I care more if a human has caused damage to some object or body. Humans that think there is a god are 9 of 10 humans, and so labeling most humans "crazy" has no value to me.
Some humans are labeled "insane" because the human tries to kill the self. If a human is not able or has no interest in staying alive, no body should put any object in to the body, unless there is no objection, to keep the human alive. A human must be free to stop living. A human should own the self. Humans must be free to put in and take out any objects and also end the life of any and all parts of the body.
I also think that a human that has caused damage with intent should be contained in a prison. If the damage was a complete accident decided by continuous popular vote, then the human should not be contained. I hate to see humans like Lorena Bobbit not being contained in a prison because of "insanity". A human that causes damage with intent should be contained in a prison for a standard time decided by popular vote. In my opinion, "insanity" is not a reason to make less prison time. If a human sees the other body being damaged, there is no excuse unless there is no time to stop (for example in a vehicle) or when there is consent.
There may be risky movements, or movements a human made that are more risky than an average body. I think that free trade of data and also the systems humans use to stop physical damage from happening with a good popular set of laws applied to all life is the best any body can do to make risk less, and keep free body movement. For the most part I am a human that supports first containing bodies that have already caused physical damage, asking for this is enough (and a good start) at this time.