Opinions 2001 AD
"When a human lights a
match, are the photons made at the time or were the photons always
there?"
-Ted Huntington
Other quotes from
me
11-27-01 I want to be
in a breeding program
11-05-01 Mystery Man
Wins Nobel Prize
10-16-01 Humans Still
Kill Other Humans on Planet Earth
10-09-01 Humans of
the USA Damage Part of Earth Called Afghanistan
09-26-01 Updated
Opinion of World Trade Center after 1 week
09-14-01 Statement on
4 Plane Crash World Trade Center
11-27-01:
MORE QUOTES
I am actually willing to see a
nude human in public as much as 50 kg overweight and not call humans in
police.
I am voluteering as a test subject human for experiments in
interracial sex and cuddling. I could go for a nice hispanic or latina (I would
enjoy hearing and seeing any difference between the two) female human (with no
religion, cosmetics or jewlery) to start with, and also asian, perhaps japanese
or main land china female human. From there I can move on to sweet, sweet arab,
indian (america and india), nubian (light, medium, and dark) and ofcourse
caucasian (black, brown, yellow, and orange hair), and mixes (for example 1/3
hispanic, 1/3 asian, 1/3 india) female humans. I am thinking that perhaps the
female humans with mixes may be more interesting and perhaps should be moved
more to the front of the list.
One interesting thing I have been
calculating (using the simple Newton s=1/2at^2 + vt) is the idea that a human
could go more fast than the photons that reflected off of the earth (3e8 m/s)
using a ship that is propelled by photons from atoms, to actually view events on
earth of the past. The photons are moving 3e8 meters/second. A ship accelerating
at 100 m/s^2 in 50 years would get to see/store photons from 13,149 years before
now (11,149 BC). Humans could see the americas before sapiens entered,
accelerating at 10 m/s2 for 50 years would be 1,314 years (686 AD). Humans could
see the violence of early christianity. That distant from the earth would make
less the chance of photons from earth that were not absorbed by atoms in space.
Plus by sending photons in the radio would be not as fast as sending another
ship back to earth that gets (or scoops up as Sagan would say) the photons
reflected from earth. A ship that moves more fast than a photon would take less
time than photons to get back with the recorded images from 13,000 years before
now. How far can photons be separated? Photons are more small than an atom, so I
think photons may be separated to see interesting info. Maybe this is only a
thought experiment, what is the crime in making such calculations, why have I
never seen such talk?
Here is some thing: Why are sex ads on the internet
filled with words like "pregnant women!", "grannies!", "transsexuals!",
"teens!", "S&M!"? For me, there is certainly some interest perhaps even as
much as 1 in 10 parts to see female humans other than the main group of 20-40
year old nicely developed, natural science female humans. I was doing video
conferencing with netmeeting and saw entries for humans like "shaved" and "I
have a tatoo on my penis". My first thought is "great - I bit off me own
finger!!! you and I should get together." Where is the good, clean, normal,
healthy sex? I would think this would be 9 of 10 parts. I think that humans are
falling in to religious thinking or religious expectation. Religious humans have
skewed or not normal views of sex. The whole thing looks to be for humans that
actually pay to see a circus, fair or a "freak" show. Most humans in science
view sex as normal and natural. Humans in science see ejaculation as an event
that should happen once every 24 hours for most humans. I and some (perhaps
most) humans in science view bisexuality as being normal and occupying perhaps
as much as 4 (to 6) of 10 parts (or thoughts of sex) for average humans. No
humans should be beat, locked in a jail or hospital for showing these kinds of
images and ideas I am only asking why there is no interest or popularity in
images of normal or average nude humans and sex? And also perhaps, why is there
such skewed or not normal views of sex?
Look at the FBI, Interpol and
Police. Why is there no "violence" and "damage" departments? There are "sex" (or
"vice") departments, and other nonviolent departments. Look at the FBI "Top 10
most wanted list". Have all of these humans killed other humans? No! There are
one or two of these humans that is wanted for "sex related crimes". Why the
focus on sex and not on damage? Some how that an action is sex related makes the
crime worse. Some how damage caused in sex is not covered under "damage" laws.
Any pain that results from some thing related to sex is not covered under
existing "stop pain" laws. If you damage a non sexual part of a body with a
knife, fist, or gun than you have escaped severe punishment, but! if you so much
as touch (not even damage!) a part of a body related to sex (buttocks, penis,
breast) of a human you could be locked in jail for years.
There are
millions of laws that would never get popular support now and probably did not
get popular support when made laws. What is an outrage and shocking is that
humans think of all laws as having the same value! When humans want to lock a
human in jail for sexual reasons, the humans have to go back to laws with words
like "lewd behavior" (for Paula Poundstone), and "buggary" (I had to find the
translation for this word, "buggary" is "anal sex", or perhaps "penis in anus")
this is being used to lock a human in England (Jonathan King) in jail for 7
years, and ofcourse with not one piece of evidence, not one bruise or scratch.
Other humans punch, spank, slap, shoot, stab ... but not one arrest! In fact the
laws that describe violence are a disaster, from the 1400s, and getting dust
because stopping violence is not of value to the paleolithic humans on earth.
Not one human will stand up against these sex laws and arrests no matter how
unjust and illogical the arrests and laws seem. The laws are not "human kill
human", or "human damage human", or "human shoot human"...the laws are
"homocide" (I guess the other species are not thought of), and "assault" (this
could include a spank, and a severe beating). Ofcourse, all of these 200 year
old laws take a back seat in money and time spent to the 70 year old drug and
sex laws.
Lack of reason and logic appears to happen for all things
related to sex, drugs and insanity. Humans that have never caused a scratch are
beaten in prisons after being sentenced to be locked in a jail for 10 years for
touching the buttock of a human under the age of 18. Again, not one bruise to
other humans from using drugs, but humans can be locked in jails for 30 years
and more for drug related activity. Humans like to say that drugs and the drug
trade causes violence, but can the same be said for guns? for religion? Religion
causes and has caused humans to kill millions of other humans for religious
reasons, should humans now lock in jail humans that trade in religious objects?
Because religion is such a bad influence on humans and is related to just as
much if not more violence that drug trade. Finally, a human that thinks there is
a holy ghost, gods, devils, celebrates a religion based on a human being
ressurrected is claimed to be "sane". Why all the focus and concern over what
humans are sane? If a human makes unrealistic claims what is the harm? What
reason is there to lock an unrealistic human in a hospital? If locking
unrealistic unobjective irrational, illogical humans in hospitals is necessary,
millions of humans that claim there is a heaven, hell, god and devil, witches,
etc... with out any evidence, and only evidence that humans made up such words
and ideas with out any physical basis, the hospitals would be full of all humans
that attend churches, synygogues, mosques and temples.
What scares me is
that the humans in the FBI, Interpol, and other "crime" groups are not
interested in stopping violence, there is more focus on stopping images and
touching and sex with consent. Pain and damage feel much more bad than humans
touching with consent. Even touching with no consent is not as bad as pain and
damage, but these humans are lost in a god based cloud of corruption and misuse
of money. The humans in the FBIs, militaries, polices of the governments of
planet earth get money from the people, but yet every thing is kept secret. I
vote that cameras be put in the fbi, military, and legistative buildings and
shared with all humans.
Here is some thing funny I was thinking of, in
all the "communist scare", and even now when I see humans that speak out against
"communism" or label humans "communist" I always say "I am glad that you are
really in favor of democracy! You should have no objections to all humans voting
on federal laws, voting on supreme court judges, democratising the military and
police!". But ofcourse, these humans are not interested in democracy at all!
Most are god loving religious humans that want violence and a square piece of
the planet earth. Why not spread religion to the earth moon, orbit and mars?
I want to see some more tough on violence people, I am tired of the
"soft on violence" humans in governments.
No more of the cloud brained
religious humans, humans should be electing 40 year old, science promoting,
tough on violence, educated smart humans, not religious, secretive, violence
promoting people. I think that the sad truth is that a majority of humans get a
bad education, are violence loving, antisexual humans ready to throw away
democracy by electing other similar brutal religious humans.
I can keep
talking and typing for hours and days, I think nothing is going to change. That
8 out of 10 humans support killing in Afghanistan is proof that 8 out of 10
humans support killing humans that have not caused damage. I guess the
difference is that the humans being killed are in a different part of the planet
earth. I see no real progress for humans in the next 50 years and only more
violence and stopping of sex and pleasure.
11-05-01:
MYSTERY MAN WINS NOBEL PRIZE
No relation to
the movie "Good Will Hunting", "Hercules", the songs "All Apologies", "Fly
Away", not refered to by ex-President of the USA Clinton when Clinton said "the
best is yet to come", or by thousands of others in "the worst is yet to come",
or by current President of USA in "Hunt down the people that did this...", a
completly unrecognized mystery man could win a Nobel prize.
In the last
month, a human with the last name "Hunt" won a Nobel Prize and some humans were
thinking and saying that I may win a Nobel prize. I have some ideas on
this:
I think I would only have a chance at winning the Nobel prize in
physics or peace. I think there should be a Nobel prize in "Science",
(interesting that the prize for "economics" was added later, and probably should
have been an award for "science" in my opinion).
Qustion: Why would I
win a Nobel prize, what have I done?
Answer: In physics I credit myself with
the following:
1) A photon actually moves 4.71e8 meters every second, not 3e8
meters every second in following a sine curve.
Update - there is the chance
that photons define a wave while moving in a straight line at 3e8 m/s. If this
is what is happening than, photons do not follow the wave pattern, but the wave
pattern is made of photons all moving in a strait line (with no frequency). So
if this idea is more true, than a single, individual photon has no frequency or
wavelength. 1a) - another contribution I made (perhaps independently of other
humans that said the same idea) that is of value is that if photons are matter
(as I am claiming) then the "wave" given to a photon (and other pieces of
matter) could be the result of gravity or the way matter moves/attracts in a
space-time geometry. This is like the pictures on the cover of "Photon Yes,
Religion No", a "wave" is made by the gravitational attraction of two (or more)
pieces of matter. 2) A photon is a piece of matter
3) Photons may be in orbit
of each other, the bending of photons by a star or a more large group of matter
can be explained by a photon being matter and changing direction as any piece of
matter would because of other pieces of matter.
4) Photons may be the basic
piece of matter for all matter in the universe, as shown, for example by the way
all matter emits photons with infrared frequencies, or the way photons are
released from a piece of wood, when the wood is "on fire", making less wood
after most of the photons that the wood was made of went to other places.
5)
Antimatter is not antimatter, but is actually only electrical opposite matter,
if an antiproton was antimatter, the antiproton and proton would leave no
photons, but in fact, the number of photons that remain in a proton, antiproton
collision is equal to the original amount of matter in the proton and
antiproton.
6) A neutron is actually a proton, electron and antineutrino.
That the photons, or matter are always there, and not made at the time when a
neutron "decays".
7) A black hole may actually be a "black star" made of
photons in orbit and what humans thought was a black "hole" or a hole in a
space-time may be only a mathematical interpretation taken from a group of
difficult to find, not well explained equations, not the more accurate
interpretation of the actual universe.
What humans have ever said the
above things?
I possibly could win a Nobel prize for "Peace"
1) For
speaking out against religion and living past the age of 30
2) For speaking
out for science
3) For promoting a democracy for all of life, the idea of a
"planet earth government", or "life of earth government"
4) For speaking out
against violence and damage, for putting "stopping violence" at the top of a
list that before did not even have "stopping violence"
5) For speaking out
against the locking in jail of humans in the nude or having sex with consent.
For promoting touch and sex with consent.
6) For speaking out against the
locking in jail of humans for using drugs, for promoting the free trade of all
drugs
7) For speaking out against the locking in jails and hospitals, humans
that have not caused damage to other humans. Almost no humans are brave enough
to question and expose the torture, druggings and injustice that is happening in
psychiatric hospitals and still remain employed, or earn enough money to
eat.
8) For exposing the brain imaging machines and speaking out for the
sharing of all data, images, and sounds.
9) Identifiying that all human
language uses the same sounds, and that a one symbol=one sound alphabet could be
used for all language to make language more simple for all humans of earth.
I think if I do win a Nobel (or any) prize that for one of the first
times the money would be spent for science and good things. Most of the humans
that win Nobel prizes will spend the money on a new castle, or boat, perhaps a
small country, or a team of human servants. I am making a video on the stories
of science, what other human is doing that? I am using what money I have to
share these ideas of stopping violence on all parts of earth, sharing images,
voting on all government decisions, gender and race variety, questioning
religion and marraige, promoting touch and sex with consent, the list goes on
and on...! What humans are doing any of this? "none" I say again and again
(ahaha). Most humans I hear and see have never used the word "science"! (or
"galaxy", or "photon", ....I lead a boring life with meter after meter of dull,
antisexual, antidata humans that make robots seem friendly).
I read
(sounds like red) that the Nobel prize is now $1,000,000 dollars US! There is a
possibility that I would not win the prize by myself. In any event, this amount
of money is limited, and my movie called "Science" (and other ideas) would only
get to be seen by thousands of humans at first. I think that after winning a
Nobel prize I could actually get paid to teach a class at a university. I am
hanging by a piece of dental floss over here. I am at a below average pay (I am
guessing) for most humans employed at a university, forget that I am watched by
hundreds of thousands of humans all the time! I get angry that most of the most
high paid humans in universities see almost no value in what I am saying and
have done. There is absolutely no honesty, science or justice at all! Only after
a Nobel prize would any of these humans finally "have to" recognize my talent
and contributions.
Me winning a Nobel prize, in my opinion, would be a
change in course for life of earth. I think me winning a Nobel prize would be
comparable to the time Einstein won an award for explaining the "photoelectric
effect". The humans that decide what human gets a Nobel prize stood up for truth
even if not popular. Not like Einstein I am not running from cameras I own my
own. I have no thing to hide and millions of things to say. Any money I get is
money well spent. For the first time science would be available for all humans.
Humans would hear at least one human questioning religion, marraige, violence,
damage, nonviolent humans locked in jail, and sharing of all images. Humans
would have more of an interest in explaining science in basic words, millions of
humans try to confuse other humans or make things sound more complex than really
are.
This is not my Nobel acceptance speech, my Nobel speech would be
more inspiring and focused. One thing that would be interesting is that I would
probably be the only male human with no neck tie or jacket. I would want some
interesting clothes, for the most part the clothes would be most comfortable. I
think that both female and male humans should not have to all wear the same
clothing and objects. Humans should feel free to wear any clothing.
Some
other thoughts:
Another award could be made for "Engineering", or
"Invention", this could go to the people at the Honda Humanoid for the first two
leg walking robot, and Linus Korvalds for making Linux.
A Nobel prize for
"science" (perhaps the stories of science, the basic promoting of science) would
have been given to Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, The Beasties, ... (can you think of
any body else that has promoted science? Foster, Bill Nye? - the problem with
Nye is the neck tie and white coat, this is more or less science with gods.)
humans at National Geographic, Nova or Amnesty International - perhaps there
should be "stopping violence", or "atheism", this would go to the "Atheist
Alliance" or "Freedom From Religion" people, or George Carlin, Larry Flynt or
Hugh Hefner, or James Haught. Perhaps a "sharing information" award could be
made.
That I am not recognized, have never been invited on to national
television, to speak any where on earth, no magazines, no radio, not one
interview indicates that science in the USA and on earth is a disaster. I am not
hiding, I am doing every thing I can to share all of my information, for most
people I am giving too much information! Humans are missing millions of images
of the past and current, the main reason is "privacy" and "copyrights". Both of
these ideas will fall to the past in my opinion, if there is a good evolution of
life on earth.
Most humans hate to see nude humans, or hear truth, feel
the antisexual in you, why hate nudity and sex with consent? Why the rabid hate
for drug use, but not violence? Why the anger at two humans touching or having
sex with consent?
I think that science in the USA and on planet earth is
filled with all religious, married humans. These humans are not willing to
accept the current advances in science because of religion. There is a monopoly
of employments in schools of religious humans only. Religious (including
married) people are given preference at the expense of truth.
Think of
what good money in my hands can do that would never be used for any thing good
or interesting. No money I own ever goes to:
promote religion
cause damage
to other humans
stop touch and sex with consent
stop the capture, copy and
trade of any and all data
buying of neck ties
buying of cosmetics,
jewlery, or perfumes
lock a human in a jail or hospital that has not caused
damage to a different human
keep secrets
One final note, humans should
question popular opinions, do not think that any theory is a perfect or final
truth. Perhaps one more not perfect theory is: tolerate the questioning of
popular opinion. Answer questions, explain science and the universe.
10-16-01:
HUMANS STILL KILL OTHER HUMANS ON
PLANET EARTH
Why have laws? If humans can kill other humans that have not
caused damage and not be locked in a jail by popular opinion? Do all laws have
the same value and popular support? Obviously no. Laws to contain humans that
caused damage are of more value than laws to stop humans from owning images of
nude humans under the age of 18. Humans should be voting on laws (what I call
sentences or statements). I like to think that a human kill human law, to stop
the killing of humans by humans could be voted on by humans of earth at some
time.
Think of the war between humans that want to stop damage and
violence versus humans that want to cause damage and do violence. The humans
that try to stop damage are clearly not winning. Here these humans missed the
chance to stop 6,000 humans killed in NYC and are now missing the chance to stop
some 2,500 humans being killed in Afghanistan.
Most of the humans of
earth are a violent, religious, antisexual group of humans. I say stop violence
and damage, instead of killing humans that have never caused a scratch. There
must be humans in Iraq, Afghanistan, Cambodia, and Vietnam that ask "What did I
ever do?" after having 10 year old legs blown off by a missle that most humans
will never get to see.
I vote for planetary policing, not planetary
destruction. Stop the humans that cause damage when the humans cause damage. In
any event, identify and store images of humans that have caused damage to other
humans.
10-09-01:
HUMANS OF THE USA DAMAGE
PART OF EARTH CALLED AFGHANISTAN
I am against the destroying and damaging of
humans and property in the part of planet Earth called "afghanistan". Humans of
earth should be using technology like cameras and machines to show what is
happening on planet earth. I doubt that the humans in the USA and Britain are
interested in capturing any of the humans that told other humans to steal four
planes and fly the planes in to buildings in the USA. When will these unprovoked
attacks that are clearly not in self defense, are with clear intent and not to
defend a different human from physical attack stop? Humans from the USA are
killing humans that probably have not caused any damage to other humans. Where
are the walking robots besides at Honda? I am amazed at the number of humans
(most caucasian humans in neck ties and wedding rings) that support the killing
that is happening. Most humans in the USA, Blair or England, Putin of Russia all
support this killing. What brutal thug or perhaps thugee based humans.
As
usual, the humans that order the killing should not be locked in a jail, the
humans that push the button to release the missle or bullet that causes damage
should be locked in a planetary jail. All humans should get to vote yes or no on
all government decisions. Humans should vote to lock in a jail room each human
that causes damage to a different human that has not caused damage, the amount
of time if any a human should be stored in a jail, what kind of food, drinks and
drugs will be paid for. Humans should not make exceptions for any one human that
kills another human not in self defense, with clear intent, and not in defense
of another human. I hate to see the number of (probably male) humans risk being
locked in jail for killing of a human, or property damage.
Most of the
humans causing the damage will never be shown, seen, identified or locked in any
jail for all the damage and death caused. This really shows that any human can
kill a different human and not be locked in a jail. I am against killing of
humans and for containing the humans that do kill other humans (again not the
humans that order violence because ordering is only sound that causes no
damage).
Here is one idea:
Send in science DVDs and images of nude
humans touching and having sex with consent. Show humans what democracy and
freedom are like. I like the idea of free vegetarian food and clean water, hey
drop that shit over here!
When will this attack stop? After 6000 humans
have been killed? I vote for stopping violence by capturing humans that have
caused damage. Sharing images and products is the path to a nonviolent democracy
for all of life in all parts of earth, not killing humans and destroying
buildings that have never caused damage.
09-26-01:
Updated opinion of World Trade Center after 1
week:
People keep using the word "terrorism" and I think "damage" and "stolen
plane" maybe better words. Humans could be using cameras to stop bike, car, and
plane "jacking" or theft, but choose not to. "Terrorism" in my opinion should
not be reason to be locked in a jail. "Scaring" people or "terrifying" people
causes no damage. Humans should be accurate in deciding what exactly we as
humans want to stop (for example violence, damage, bombing, shooting metal
pieces at, stabbing, punching, etc...).
Humans should not blame a race of
people for the actions of 3 people of the same race. Everybody is different.
Humans should not separate humans into "us" versus "them" because there are only
6 billion humans (and the occasional other species) on one planet, some have
caused damage and most have not. I look forward to a time when humans of both
genders and all races stand together on the moon of earth feeling the most
pleasure possible with care for science and the beautiful universe.
The
humans that stole and flew the 4 planes were religious people. Once again,
religious people, causing damage for a god, in this case "Allah". What are the
chances of that? Most humans in the USA are also conservative and religious, but
the religion is Christianity and the god is named "God" (confusing huh!).
Religious people crash 4 planes and in the USA humans promptly start singing
"God Bless America". Ironic that the people flying the 4 planes were probably
singing "Allah Bless Afghanistan". If humans got sex with consent, and learned
the stories of science I doubt there would be as many people willing to throw
their life and body away. Be sure that there is more than one human that will
kill other humans when asked to from any military of any nation.
I have
to laugh when I see that the people in the "Taliban" want to see evidence that
Bin Laden was some how instructing people to crash planes. Here in the USA
people do not need evidence. Never so much as an image. Where is the video of
Laden saying (in arabic) "I want you to steal 4 planes and crash the planes in
to buildings."? And even if there was such a video (I think putting some cameras
in Afghanistan and on Bin is probably a good idea), what ever the "charge" may
be is going to be a crime of sound only. The real problem is humans that will
kill because some body tells the person to!
The patriot flag waving is
upsetting also. Whenever I see a USA flag on a car, I think there goes a person
in the Taliban now. Where are the planet earth flags? There is already a planet
democracy forming that will allow humans to move freely on the planet and in
between planets with no fear of pain or damage. The humans in the USA have one
of the worst security failures since the JFK killing and Pearl Harbor, but are
more happy than ever with the current systems and way of doing things in the
USA? I can see that security, free trade of all images, sounds and other data,
and stopping of violence and damage, is not going to need to improve for the no
science, antisexual, violence loving, religious majority of humans in the USA.
09-14-01:
Statement on 4 plane crash World Trade
Center:
I am telling humans of earth to stay on course for stopping violence
and damage, to share images from on the 4 planes that crashed, to expose the 20
year old machines that hear and see thought, to not take part in religion, to
stand and support science and truth, to go to and live in orbit, and on the
earth moon now more than ever before.
The humans that caused all this
damage and loss of life are dead. There are humans that planned, took part in,
or could have stopped the 19 humans from killing more than 5000 humans. I ask
that humans simply identify and share images and other data indicating what
humans are involved. I do not support locking these humans in a jail.
I
am saying today that all the images that must be popular, images on board the
plane, of the humans in apartments that were to fly and crash a plane are going
to be put in the "JFK cabinet", not to be seen for 300 to 500 years from now
when humans care less for religion, privacy and secrecy and more for truth that
is seen and heard and sharing of all info. Humans in the USA, and on planet
earth are not good at stopping violence. Stopping violence and "damage" are not
at the top of the list for most humans. This is the part of earth where more
than 40 years after a human killed JFK, most humans have never seen one image of
the human that actually did kill JFK from the front as shown clearly in the
Zubruter film. My guess is the loss of 5000 humans will be no exception for
religious humans. These images, also will be kept secret for an elite few, while
the vast majority of humans on earth will live in ignorence.
I am angered
by all the humans turning to religion. The humans that are President of United
Nations, President of the USA, Chancellor of UCI, CEO of American Airlines,
Boeing, United Airlines, have all used the word "prayer"! What chance does truth
have? I am not going to sit back and watch thousands of more bodies get killed
while humans are busy in a church, temple, synygogue, or mosque praying to
invisible, non existant, human made up gods and devils. Will these humans be
rubbing a rabbit foot? kissing the belly of a buddha? viewing a horoscope?
reading tarot cards? chanting with a tamborine like a human in the moonies then
jumping off a building?
Where are the images of the 18 humans that did
all this damage? Where are the images of the humans killed? Where are the images
from the cockpit and aisle of each of the 4 planes? Where are the images taken
from the eyes, and thoughts of humans watching the plane from inside the world
trade center buildings? Where are the images from each room in the world trade
center buildings? Where are humans asking, "should there be cameras on planes?",
"should there be cameras in airports?", "should these images be shared with all
humans?", "should humans focus on stopping violence more, and less on stopping
drug use and prostitution?". I am still against filling the prisons with humans
that use, buy and sell drugs, these humans are only causing damage, if any, to
self, not to other bodies. Maybe if humans got to see nude humans, got sex once
a day, got to hug, kiss, speak and think freely, with no fear of being locked in
jail, with no fear of a pretend god, heavens and hells, having heard the story
of life of earth and science there would be less violence and damage to this
more small than Jupiter sized planet. Humans live on the surface of a planet
thousands of times smaller than the star the planet goes around. With 7 of 10
parts of earth now some form of democracy, I ask again that humans make a
democracy for all of life of earth, stop violence every where on earth, free
humans from jails and hospitals on earth that have not directly caused damage
and are being contained with no consent and clear objection.
My main
opinions on these 4 plane crashes is that humans must stop violence and damage,
must share images and sounds, no more religion, free humans from jails and
hospitals that have not caused damage in every part of earth.
Stop religion by stopping the arrest of humans for images and
sounds.
Prison for humans that have caused damage only
Back to Main Page